USGBC and demand response: Piloting demand response in LEED | U.S. Green Building Council
Please upgrade your browser. This site requires a newer version to work correctly. Read more
Published on
Written by
Posted in LEED
Published on
Written by
Posted in LEED

Learn more about the results of the LEED pilot credit on demand response.

This article is the first in a four-part series about demand response.

Energy use has long been a focus of USGBC. Historically, LEED energy use strategies focused on efficiency: reducing the amount of energy used to perform a certain task or provide a certain service. As LEED has matured, we’ve given more thought to other ways building owners and facility managers can improve the sustainability of their energy use.

In LEED v4, we introduced a new credit for demand response (DR) to encourage building owners and facility managers to take into account not only how much electricity a building used, but also when, and to reward LEED project teams that willingly reduce electricity use during periods of high demand.

In 2010, USGBC rolled out Energy and Atmosphere Pilot Credit 8 Demand Response (EApc8) to test the credit requirements and gauge market interest in demand response as a strategy. In 2013, USGBC took a closer look at registrations and certification trends for the pilot credit. A few highlights are included below.

When it closed in 2015, 270 projects had registered for the pilot credit. These projects represent 11 countries around the world.

United States 127
Canada 124
Greece 7
China 3
Finland 3
Denmark 1
Hungary 1
Ireland 1
Israel 1
Japan 1
Mexico 1
Total 270

Table 1. DR pilot credit registrations by country


Within the United States, the highest number of registrations were seen in California and New York.

Figure 1. DR pilot credit registrations by state


The pilot credit was written primarily for commercial buildings. Pilot credit registrations were mostly office and mixed-use buildings, but also included many other project types.

Figure 2. DR pilot credit registrations by rating system and project type

Of the projects that submitted the pilot credit for review, there was 96.5 percent achievement rate. Feedback from project teams indicated that the pilot credit was an easy, low-cost strategy for projects with the necessary infrastructure already in place.

EApc8 was formally adopted as Energy and Atmosphere Credit Demand Response in LEED v4. In May 2015, the pilot was closed and moved to the LEED Innovation Catalog.

About this series

This article is the first in a four-part series about demand response and the Demand Response Partnership Program:

  1. Piloting demand response in LEED
  2. Understanding participant experience and perceptions
  3. Quantifying the impacts of demand response
  4. Implementing demand response: Case studies

Read the full Demand Response Pilot Credit report

USGBC Articles can be accessed in the USGBC app for iOS or Android on your iPhone, iPad or Android device.
iOS App on App StoreAndroid app on Google Play